<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CDs vs FLACs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lewiz.org/archive/2007/06/10/cds-vs-flacs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lewiz.org/archive/2007/06/10/cds-vs-flacs/</link>
	<description>everyone has a shangri-la to find</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 23:58:45 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: lewiz</title>
		<link>http://www.lewiz.org/archive/2007/06/10/cds-vs-flacs/#comment-21562</link>
		<dc:creator>lewiz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jun 2007 20:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lewiz.org/archive/2007/06/10/cds-vs-flacs/#comment-21562</guid>
		<description>Hmm, but your average laptop CD drive has better bit correction than your above-average CD player.  I don't think it's to do with errors in the bitstream, although it could be the funny 48-bit stuff that my soundcard does.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm, but your average laptop CD drive has better bit correction than your above-average CD player.  I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s to do with errors in the bitstream, although it could be the funny 48-bit stuff that my soundcard does.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DWL</title>
		<link>http://www.lewiz.org/archive/2007/06/10/cds-vs-flacs/#comment-21561</link>
		<dc:creator>DWL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jun 2007 20:00:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lewiz.org/archive/2007/06/10/cds-vs-flacs/#comment-21561</guid>
		<description>Well, your CD player has nice hardware accelerated 24-bit Reed-Solomon Forward Error Correction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, your CD player has nice hardware accelerated 24-bit Reed-Solomon Forward Error Correction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lewiz</title>
		<link>http://www.lewiz.org/archive/2007/06/10/cds-vs-flacs/#comment-21283</link>
		<dc:creator>lewiz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jun 2007 16:04:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lewiz.org/archive/2007/06/10/cds-vs-flacs/#comment-21283</guid>
		<description>If it was all about subscriptions I wouldn't be listening to the Guillemots now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If it was all about subscriptions I wouldn&#8217;t be listening to the Guillemots now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: inomine&#124;</title>
		<link>http://www.lewiz.org/archive/2007/06/10/cds-vs-flacs/#comment-21281</link>
		<dc:creator>inomine&#124;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jun 2007 16:03:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lewiz.org/archive/2007/06/10/cds-vs-flacs/#comment-21281</guid>
		<description>Guillemots are awesome. Everyone loves them, the people that don't are wrong. Although buying CDs is very 1998, it's all about the subscriptions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Guillemots are awesome. Everyone loves them, the people that don&#8217;t are wrong. Although buying CDs is very 1998, it&#8217;s all about the subscriptions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
